What Voting on Theory Does
We cannot arrest the slow death of clash unless we repair our basic conception of what it means to judge a theory debate.
Anthony Trufanov
Normal Means: You Don’t Know What’s in the Box
What happens when the aff or the neg "wins" normal means?
Leveling Up Your Debate Software 3: Curing Stylepox
Fixing an age-old pet peeve.
The China Joint Project CP
A generic strategy against non-military affirmatives
Stop Losing to the "Strategic Stability" DA
In this house, we don't say "strat stab."
How to Give Diverse K 2ACs Without Breaking the Prep Bank
Framework-first K debating leaves affs vulnerable and misses a strategic opportunity to defend the worldview that motivates their case. By constructing 1ACs from a consistent, consciously chosen ideological perspective, teams can respond more substantively while keeping prep manageable.
Arctic War is Not A Very Good Impact
How to take advantage of boilerplate Arctic War impact debating when you're negative, and how to make Arctic War punch above its weight when you're affirmative.
We have a file store!
Announcing our file marketplace for third party contributors.
Topicality on the Arctic Topic—Practice!
Practice debating topicality on the Arctic Topic.
Topicality on the Arctic Topic
Taking inventory of the topicality arguments on the Arctic topic.